Aloha to Aging Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270815236
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Marietta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7707227641
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $146,177
- Expenses
- $158,169
- Assets
- $90,322
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- DAWN REED (Executive Dir.)
- CHRISTIAN KUSWITA (Director)
- MICHAEL MCCRACKEN (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Aloha to Aging, Inc. funds programs and services to ensure enhanced quality of life for seniors, their care partners, and the metro Atlanta community. The Company is volunteer based and serves those ranging in age from 4-98+ through partnering with daycares, local middle school-colleges, area businesses and community members at large.
What it reported doing in 2024
Programs and services include a therapeutically structured, social day respite program for adults 55 and older who are no longer driving; multiple diverse monthly support groups (Parkinsons, Alzheimers, Caregiever's, etc); two simulation programs for both age health-related and cognitive changes; and numerous monthly educational and weekly specially designed wellness programs specifically aimed to meet the needs and interest of seniors and family caregivers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.6%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 35
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.6% of revenue deployed · 34.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.