Alltricity Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840306025
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Englewood, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038655544
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,533,739
- Expenses
- $1,622,470
- Assets
- $2,294,304
- Liabilities
- $1,235,099
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSHUA JOHNSON (PAST PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK HANRAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT EDUCATION)
- LISA LEWIS (VICE PRESIDENT MEMBERSHIP)
- NATHAN TATE (VICE PRESIDENT VITAL ISSUE)
- STEVE VETSCH (PRESIDENT ELECT)
Highest reported compensation
- KEN WILMOT (SECRETARY): $288,634 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Preparing the electric energy industry for the future through education and networking.
What it reported doing in 2025
Alltricity network's vision is our mission realized. Every effort by alltricity network staff, board and volunteers is focused on achieving this vision for the assocation. This is the ultimate destination of our journey through association and industry challenges. With every decision and effort on behalf of the assocation, the impact on the vision will be considered.alltricity network will be the resource every electric utility employee can count on because it provides access to a knowledge bank of experiences and people that have solutions. From training and education venues to the exchanging of information with a fellow member, alltricity network will help make each electric energy job easier.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $289K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.