Allston Brighton Community Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042716278
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Brighton, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6177873874
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neighborhood, Block Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,892,073
- Expenses
- $5,594,777
- Assets
- $51,818,204
- Liabilities
- $52,950,976
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN HEASTER (PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
- GREG RITTCHEN (VICE PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS)
- JOHN WOODS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN WOODS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $164,746 total reported compensation
- CAITLIN ROBILLARD (DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT): $128,497 total reported compensation
- RACHEL REGIS (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $108,904 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The allston brighton community development corporation (the cdc) builds a stronger and more stable community by representing and supporting the expressed interests, positive engagement and leadership of allston brighton's diverse local communities, institutions, individuals and families of all incomes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Housing development and management and resident services.in march, acquired a historic building in brighton center consisting of 33 apartment units and 7,500 square feet of commercial space. Acquisition funding was provided by the city of boston and cedac. The property will be rehabilitated and converted to affordable rental housing. In july, began construction on the deep energy retrofit of a 20-unit property, switching to all electric heating, cooling and domestic hot water. This project is funded by a green financing loan from Massachusetts housing partnership, $2.6 million in state and city funds, private grants, and the preliminary approval in 2024 of $330,000 in utility incentives from the low-income energy assistance network (lean). This rehab is projected to reduce energy usage by 70%. In november, completed the deep energy retrofit of a 33-unit property. This rehab was primarily funded by 4% low income housing tax credits (lihtc) and $4 million in public funds. Secured a $2 million grant from the department of energy resources to decarbonize a 50-unit property. Pending the receipt of additional public and private funds, this project will commence in fall 2025. Awarded 49 project-based vouchers (pbvs) from the boston housing authority that will be used at the future development of 49 units of affordable rental apartments for older adults at a site acquired in late 2023. A small project review application was submitted to the city of boston in august. This new construction project is anticipated to start in 2026.provided services for residents in 506 units of rental housing, with a mixture of virtual and in-person programming. Met with residents for 487 unique meetings on a range of topics, including housing stability, financial assistance, supportive services and administrative support. Assisted 52 residents with rental and utility assistance applications, receiving approval for $136,285 to help prevent displacement and support economic recovery. Produced and distributed a bi-monthly newsletter to 506 households to keep them informed about resources, events and support available through the program and in the neighborhood. Held bi-monthly mobile food pantries at 2 property sites in partnership with abcd, providing 306 bags of food. Continued an after-school program for 13 youth with 13 tutors from boston college providing academic support. Launched a partnership with boston university's anatomy academy, providing youth with interactive science learning experiences. Distributed backpacks and school supplies to 115 youth at the start of the academic year. Hosted a community vaccination clinic and continued distributing covid test kits and masks throughout the year to support residents' health and safety. Delivered 54 resident programs in collaboration with local partners. Partnered with masshousing's tap program to enhance resident engagement and access to resources. Collaborated with the eliot school of fine and applied arts to run adult ceramics workshops, offering creative outlets for expression and healing. Introduced a mediation and art series, helping residents explore conflict resolution through art-based practices. Facilitated a mass bioed workshop to promote stem engagement and career exploration. Hosted an alzheimer's awareness workshop to support caregivers and raise awareness of memory care resources. Offered zumba and yoga wellness classes to promote physical activity and mental health. Celebrated the seasons with themed events including the annual block party, haunted hallway, and, in partnership with abcd, turkey distribution. During the december holidays, distributed toys for 129 children in partnership with toys for tots. In total, 642 residents attended our resident programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 93.8%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.26; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 93.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 9 filed program accomplishments · $5.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $165K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 28 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.