Allone Community Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 271632045
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $240,799
- Expenses
- $291,644
- Assets
- $30,035
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSH HAWK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DAVID LIBBY (CHAIRMAN)
- MONICA SEIDEL (DIRECTOR)
- LINDA JO DEVLAEMINCK (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Engage in collaborative service efforts with the churches of north portland to provide transitional housing for single parents and their children.
What it reported doing in 2023
Community of hope serves houseless, single-parent families. We provide shelter, classes, mentoring, and community life to eight families at a time. Each family can stay for four to six months. Community of hope has a special focus on helping both parents and children heal from past trauma and supporting parents in building skills and finding stable jobs and housing.of the families who completed the program at community of hope, 77% found a stable home when they left. In addition, according to our entrance and exit surveys, parents resiliency scores increased an average of 7.4% on the cd-risc scale. During this period we were able to serve 21 families for a total of 58 people.according to the portland 2020 point in time count, people of color make up 28% of the population of portland. However, they make up 38% of the houseless population. Of those we have served at community of hope, 57.1% of the families served for this fiscal year have been people of color. In addition to race, the following attributes and life experiences can impact their relationships: age, gender, sexual orientation, family relationships, physical charisteristics, economic status, education, a history of abuse, varied abilities and other lived experiences. These same attributes and life experiences can affect their abilities to access the services and resources they need to improve their housing situation.we welcome traumatized families into a safe, homey setting where they can recover from the stresses of houselessness, domestic violence, drug use, and poverty. Families have a private room where they can keep their possessions and sleep in a real bed. Parents connect with supportive mentors who celebrate victories with them, brainstorm how to overcome obstacles, and encourage them to set and meet goals. Just having someone in their corner means a lot to parents. Community of hopes classes help residents overcome housing barriers and learn skills in resiliency, nurturing parenting, and budgeting for financial success. Residents completed 565 class hours during the year. By living among peers, the parents offer mutual support. We consider this to be a vital component of our success.an important part of our program is our focus on children who have experienced adverse childhood experiences (aces). According to numerous studies, aces are the worst health risk in our nation, causing statically increased risk for negative physical, mental and social problems. These facts inform our concern for the children who all arrive at community of hope having experienced houselessness. Many have also either witnessed or experienced abuse, domestic violence, drug use or incarceration of parents, bullying, loss of important relationships, or natural disasters. We provide an environment and training that support parents in healing from their own trauma. This enables parents to see and meet the needs of their children. In addition, we offer a trauma-specific, art-based program for the children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.8%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.8% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $231K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.