Allina Medical Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411781624
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-N 2007
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6122620660
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $479,411,241
- Expenses
- $479,411,241
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our missionwe serve our communities by providing exceptional care, as we prevent illness, restore health and provide comfort to all who entrust us with their care.our vision we will: put the patient first; make a difference in people's lives by providing exceptional care and service; create a healing environment where passionate people thrive and excel; and lead collaborative efforts that solve our community's health care challenges.our valuesintegrity, respect, trust, compassion, and stewardship
What it reported doing in 2011
Cost of participating in government programs: the amc is committed to serving all persons in need, regardless of race, creed, sex, nationality, religion, disability, age, or ability to pay. To promote access to care for all individuals, amc participates in the following public health care programs: medicare, medicaid, minnesotacare, and general assistance. Payments from these programs frequently do not cover the costs amc incurs to serve program beneficiaries. In 2011, amc provided $32,469,400 in health care services in excess of the reimbursement received by public programs, and taxes and fees related to these programs. The following is a breakdown of costs related to these programs, services and additional taxes and fees.costs in excess of medicare and medicaid paymentsamc provides services to public program enrollees. Such public programs have reimbursed at amounts less than amc's cost. In 2011, amc expended $16,780,552 beyond reimbursements to provide care for medicare patients and an additional $5,766,252 beyond reimbursements for medicaid patients. Minnesotacare taxamc also participates in the funding of medical care for the uninsured through a minnesotacare tax of 2% on certain net revenue. Patients who are unable to get insurance through their employer are eligible to participate in minnesotacare. Amc paid $7,212,562 for the minnesotacare tax in 2011.taxes and feesamc pays property taxes to local and state governments used in funding civil and education services to the community. In total, amc paid $2,710,034 million in taxes and fees in 2011.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.6%; rating input score 87; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $422.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 33 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 31 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.