Allied Veterans Memorial Committee of Ridgewood & Glendale Ny Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383853340
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Glendale, NY, USA
Phone
9176051398
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,150
Expenses
$7,625
Assets
$25,365
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Daniel Wisotsky (Finance Chairman)
  • Robert Lohrey (Treasurer)
  • Paul Schottenhamel (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary goals of this Committee is to consolidate and unify the various American War Veterans Organizations of this community so that such worth while aims as: fostering of civic ideals, unity of purpose community betterment, the safe guarding of Veterans rights, Loyalty to American ideals, the creation of closer harmony and to perpetuate the memory of our departed comrades by conducting annually the Memorial Day Parade and Services.

What it reported doing in 2024

The primary goals of this Committee is to consolidate and unify the various American War Veterans Organizations of this community so that such worth while aims as: fostering of civic ideals, unity of purpose community betterment, the safe guarding of Veterans rights, Loyalty to American ideals, the creation of closer harmony and to perpetuate the memory of our departed comrades by conducting annually the Memorial Day Parade and Services. The committee provided services for 5000 people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.7%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.33; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -77.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.