Allied Services
Legal name: Allied Services Skilled Nursing Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232523688
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Clarks Summit, PA, US
- Phone
- 570-348-1407
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $39,171,602
- Expenses
- $38,911,322
- Assets
- $12,792,879
- Liabilities
- $2,835,680
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO): $1,384,674 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL AVVISATO (ASSISTANT TREASURER/SECRET): $720,317 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER NYE (LPN): $198,777 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide compassionate, person-centered care and trusted support at every stage of life, helping individuals overcome challenges and achieve their greatest potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
The center operates a skilled nursing facility licensed for 327 beds. The center provides intermediate and skilled nursing care and related medical and other services to patients who, because of age, illness, injury, and convalescence or handicap, require such care and services. The center had total patient days of 103,319, the majority of which consisted of medicaid (70,229) and medicare (10,557) days. The center's average occupancy for fiscal year 2025 was 86%.services were provided to patients who met certain criteria without charge or at amounts less than the established rates. Charges forgone for services rendered and supplies furnished under the charity care policy amounted to approx. $5,289 during the year ended june 30, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 87
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.