Allied Services
Legal name: Allied Services Personal Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232862231
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Clarks Summit, PA, US
- Phone
- 570-348-1407
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,405,446
- Expenses
- $35,779,494
- Assets
- $43,925,289
- Liabilities
- $30,821,641
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT/CEO): $1,384,674 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL AVVISATO (ASSISTANT TREASURER/SECRET): $720,317 total reported compensation
- MICHAELINE SWIRYNA (LPN): $248,810 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Allied Services, our mission is centered on people - their stories, their resilience, and their potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Allied services personal care, inc. (meade st. Skilled nursing center) is a 133 bed skilled nursing facility providing 24 hours skilled nursing care and therapy services. The facility is located in the heights section of wilkes-barre and was formerly known as little flower manor prior allied's purchase in 2019. Allied services personal care, inc. (meade st. Residence) is a 76 bed licensed personal care residence. Services are provided to the residents to assist them with their daily care needs and many daily, group activities are scheduled for socialization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 82.3%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 82.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $29.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.