Allied Services

Legal name: Allied Services Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232523682
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Clarks Summit, PA, US
Phone
570-348-1407
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,763,705
Expenses
$4,825,444
Assets
$89,334,200
Liabilities
$19,808,952

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • JAMES A BROGNA (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • WILLIAM P CONABOY ESQ (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT/CEO): $1,384,674 total reported compensation
  • MICHAEL AVVISATO (ASSISTANCE TREASURER/SECRE): $720,317 total reported compensation
  • JAMES A BROGNA (VICE PRESIDENT): $215,425 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is rooted in our commitment to Northeastern Pennsylvania. We help individuals overcome challenges and achieve their greatest potential by providing person-centered services, exceptional care, and above all, comfort.

What it reported doing in 2024

Allied services foundation provides management support, community outreach, fundraising and fund management to allied services' affiliated not-for-profit organizations: allied services institute of rehabilitation medicine ("allied rehab hospital"), john heinz institute of rehabilitation hospital ("heinz rehab hospital"), allied services skilled nursing center ("skilled nursing"), allied health care services (including vocational services, home health and in-home services, behavioral health and developmental disabiltiies services), allied services continuing care retirement community, and burnley workshop of the poconos, inc. ("burnley employment & rehab services"). (continued on schedule o.)together, these entities form a continuum of post-acute services, including medical rehabilitation (for children and adults), skilled nursing care, in-home non-medical and home health services, vocational and residential programs for persons with intellectual, developmental, behavioral and physical disabilities. The foundation's role is to develop external support for these services, to assist in business and compliance functions, and to communicate allied services' charitable mission, goals and objectives to internal and external audiences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 86
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.2%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 48.5%; rating input score 49
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.51; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 20.2% of revenue deployed · 48.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.