Allied H-inns Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582462641
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA
Phone
6108349500
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Real Estate Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,043
Expenses
$0
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • E SCOTT URDANG (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID J BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY)
  • VINCENT SANFILIPPO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • E TODD BRIDDELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK GRECO (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD J FERST (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER)
  • E SCOTT URDANG (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID J BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Allied/h-inns, inc. Is a Florida corporation that serves as a title holding company for the benefit of its shareholder, the honeywell international, inc., master pension trust (the "master trust"). The master trust is a part of one or more qualified plans within the meaning section 401(a) of the internal revenue code of 1986 as amended (the code), and is exempt from federal income taxation under code section 501(a). Allied/h-inns, inc. Was organized for the exclusive purpose of holding title to the property, collecting income therefrom, and distributing residual income to its sole shareholder, the master trust.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: Filed program service accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.