Allied Credit Union
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 630510570
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Jackson, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2512465178
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Credit Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $597,617
- Expenses
- $442,105
- Assets
- $14,122,369
- Liabilities
- $10,799,515
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IRA RIKARD (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- WILLIE WOODARD (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN W PERKINS (MANAGER): $52,951 total reported compensation
- LINDA BEECH (ACTING MANAGER): $48,249 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cooperative society incorporated for the twofold purpose of promoting thrift among its members and creating a source of credit for them at legitimate rates of interest.
What it reported doing in 2014
Code of Alabama, sec 5-17-1, states that a credit union is a cooperative society incorporated for the twofold purpose of promoting thrift among its members and creating a source of credit for them at legitimate rates of interest. Allied credit union, an Alabama state chartered credit union, was established to provide these services primarily to employees and family members of boise cascade paper company. The credit union's field of membership also includes selected employee groups as well as individuals that reside in clarke and Washington counties. As of december 31, 2014, the credit union had membership and provided services to approximately 2,300 members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 31.94; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.76; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $442K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $53K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.