Allied Arts and Humanities Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237072026
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Bartlesville, OK, USA
- Phone
- 9183271680
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts Council/Agency
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,714
- Expenses
- $39,524
- Assets
- $48,616
- Liabilities
- $3,375
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAY LITTLE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KAY LITTLE (PRESIDENT)
- LAURA RILEY (TREASURER)
- RICHARD MITCHELL (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arts education and arts programming for the public
What it reported doing in 2013
Arts in education: spotlite and missoula theater programs in drama for elementary students, poetry alive dramatic interpretation of poetry program for elementary students
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 63.7%; rating input score 64
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -37.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -73.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -42.2% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 63.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.