Alliance of Women Directors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900588660
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3104593909
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,324,265
- Expenses
- $1,181,119
- Assets
- $321,315
- Liabilities
- $11,015
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KYLIE EATON (Executive Dir.): $55,385 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A professional organization dedicated to the education and advocatory of women directors.
What it reported doing in 2025
Career Advancement Programs (CAP)Alliance of Women Directors provides year-round Career Advancement Programs designed to support women and gender-expansive directors at all stages of their careers. These programs include workshops, masterclasses, panels, Directing the Actor Lab, and Works in Progress (WIP) sessions that offer structured peer and industry feedback on projects in development and post-production.In 2025, AWD served approximately 700+ members and additional public participants through dozens of events. These programs provide critical access to industry knowledge, creative feedback, and professional networks, helping directors strengthen their craft and advance sustainable careers in film, television, and new media.Back to Set: Working Directors Intensive (BTS)Back to Set is AWDs annual two-day symposium focused on advancing directing craft and career sustainability. The program features hands-on workshops, panels, and masterclasses led by established directors, executives, and industry leaders, covering topics such as directing actors, episodic television, pitching, and on-set leadership.In 2025, Back to Set served approximately 200 attendees and featured 10+ sessions and keynote speakers. The program provides direct access to high-level industry professionals and practical training, equipping directors with the tools, confidence, and connections needed to succeed in a competitive industry.Program 3: Fiscal Sponsorship ProgramAWDs Fiscal Sponsorship Program supports independent film and media projects directed by women and gender-expansive directors by providing a nonprofit structure through which filmmakers can raise funds. The program enables projects to receive tax-deductible donations, access institutional funding, and build financial credibility during development and production.In 2025, AWD fiscally sponsored 20 projects and facilitated over $1M in donations to supported films and media projects. This program expands access to funding for underrepresented directors and helps bring new, diverse stories to audiences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $36.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.8%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 46% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 33.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.