Alliance of Families for Justice Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821971330
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3479730580
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Inmate Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,468,158
- Expenses
- $2,278,905
- Assets
- $506,187
- Liabilities
- $12,164
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Danny Glover (Board Chair and President)
- Soffiyah Elijah (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Soffiyah Elijah (Executive Director): $208,459 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Alliance of Families for Justice is to support, empower and mobilize families and individuals impacted by the criminal justice system so they can marshal their collective power to create a just world.
What it reported doing in 2023
In 2023, the Alliance of Families for Justice (AFJ) had a highly productive year, marked by a range of activities in its various units. The Family Support Unit organized weekly community organizing meetings and empowerment circles via Zoom, complemented by in-person events such as a holiday dinner, a family fun day, and healing retreats, which included a special retreat for parents. AFJ also began offering healing through the arts sessions online. The Legal Support Unit saw significant increases in both parole hearing preparation and prison condition cases. The Unit conducted outreach (continued on Schedule O)sessions in Ithaca, partnering with Law-NY and engaging private practitioners and law students. This led to the successful release of several clients who had served long sentences, marking a noteworthy achievement for the Unit. In terms of organizing and advocacy, AFJ held monthly training sessions and established the Shut Down Attica Coalition and continued their campaign to close Attica prison. They organized voter registration efforts on Rikers Island, participated in panel presentations, and maintained lobbying efforts to restore voting rights for incarcerated individuals. A new full-time advocate was hired for this unit, alongside the creation of fellowships aimed at enhancing their voting rights initiatives. A part-time campaign coordinator was also hired to assist the Organizing and Advocacy Unit. The Youth Empowerment Project provided in-depth learning sessions on topics including use of the Civilian Complaint Review Board, the importance of voting, how local and state government is organized and operated, financial literacy, wealth development, current events and leadership skill development. The project also saw an increase in youth participation in free behavioral health services, emphasizing the importance of mental well-being. AFJ's Ithaca satellite office continued to offer support with weekly men's and bi-weekly women's healing circles, community outreach, and voter registration efforts. They also hired a fellow and established a fellowship in honor of Dr. James Turner, furthering our mission in these regions. In fundraising, AFJ achieved success with initiatives such as a well-attended gala, grassroots fundraising efforts, and an increase in new grant proposals submitted. Throughout the year, AFJ produced a monthly newsletter, created a new executive assistant position, and elevated the Director of Grants and Development to a full-time role.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -55.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 66.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $208K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.