Alliance of Automotive Service Providers of Pa Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231708635
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Shermans Dale, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7175648400
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $215,309
- Expenses
- $165,671
- Assets
- $357,219
- Liabilities
- $262,614
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID BAUSINGER (PAST PRESIDENT)
- ALLEN WETZEL (PRESIDENT)
- DON HUDSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- AMANDA HENRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- AMANDA HENRY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $47,250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Trade association representing the independent automotive service providers in Pennsylvania through training, legislative lobbying and tracking and networking
What it reported doing in 2020
Lobbying and tracking federal and state legislation and regulations impacting the industry such as emissions, insurance, franchise and labor laws. Providing mechanical repair and techincal training during the year to members and non-members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for affiliated organizations.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.16; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 77% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $166K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $47K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.