Alliance Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843081654
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Intercourse, PA, USA
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,000,055
- Expenses
- $463,373
- Assets
- $609,158
- Liabilities
- $3,709
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- DAVE SMUCKER (CHAIRMAN)
- AMOS KING (TREASURER)
- LEWIS ZOOK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
By the Lord’s grace, guidance, and power, our goal is to see the Great Commission (Matthew 28:16-20) fulfilled in this generation. Our staff oversees day to day operations to accomplish our mission and vision. This includes inviting and empowering volunteers throughout our many opportunities. Jada Esh (Operations Admin) [email protected]. We are an affiliated partner of Hopewell Network. They provide apostolic oversight, accountability, relational connections; and ongoing resources and equipping to develop healthy leaders. They also provide credentials and ordination for network leaders and senior pastors. Lester Zimmerman and Allan Yoder serve as leaders of the Hopewell Network; and as spiritual advisors to us as part of our partnership. Lloyd Hoover (former bishop of LMC) has been involved in regional leadership and Anabaptist reconciliation and activation for decades; he also...
What it reported doing in 2025
Empowering those serving our world with opportunities and resources to amplify their impact. Learn more about trips, projects, missionary sustainability, and helpful resources.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 43.6%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 94.2%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $51.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.31; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 43.6% of revenue deployed · 94.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $436K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.