Alliance for Trust in AI Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933417217
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2023444597
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$187,500
Expenses
$272,573
Assets
$204,515
Liabilities
$184,920

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • William Bartholomew (Director)
  • Todd Frankel (Director)
  • Terrence Thompson (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To pioneer a cross-sectoral approach to AI trust by collaborating with key players across industries to develop pragmatic, actionable approaches and policy recommendations.

What it reported doing in 2024

(1) ATAI continued to work around its consensus Principles that help organizations manage Governance, Data, Society, Safety, and Implementation for their AI trust programs. These principles are based on the deep expertise of our membership and globally recognized frameworks. (2) ATAI proactively engaged in international, federal, and state policy-making efforts. We convene members and hold discussion sessions to respond quickly with Policy Positions that help our members, standards organizations, and policymakers understand how to support trust in AI. ATAI also responded to requests for comment and feedback on various policy efforts. (3) ATAI publishes a blog and holds educational webinars that explore policy-relevant technical concepts and developments in AI, including common terms, guardrails and safeguards, model weights, and standards.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -45.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 52.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 60.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.