Alliance for the Shenandoah Valley
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 412233874
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- New Market, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5409083914
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,430,404
- Expenses
- $1,276,608
- Assets
- $3,160,235
- Liabilities
- $100,769
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- KATHERINE WOFFORD (EXECUTIVE DI): $95,636 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Alliance for the shenandoah valley informs and engages people to protect the natural resources, cultural heritages, and rural character of our region.
What it reported doing in 2024
Alliance for the shenandoah valley envisions a shenandoah valley sustained by farms and forests, clean streams, and rivers, and thriving communities. The alliance's mission is to inform and engage people to protect the natural resources, cultural heritages, and rural character of our region. Virginia's shenandoah valley is one of our nation's most iconic landscapes, rich in extraordinary natural and historic resources deserving of protection. With headwaters on the one-million-acre george Washington national forest lands to the west and shenandoah national park to the east, the shenandoah river provides clean drinking water to Washington dc. The valley's streams and rivers also supply water that is the lifeblood for our local farming economy, and they support thriving outdoor recreation and tourism sectors. Our service area covers six counties in the valley - augusta, frederick, page, rockingham, shenandoah, and warren - and the cities and towns within. We do the important work outlined in our mission by promoting land use and transportation policies that respect the valley's natural and cultural resources and communities, fostering land and water conservation through projects and programs that ensure clean and plentiful water, protected farm and forest land and preserved cultural resources, supporting economic development that is in keeping with the valley's unique character and resources, cultivating an active, educated, and informed public, and mobilizing citizens on regional issues of importance. Visit our website, shenandoahalliance.org, to meet our dedicated board and staff and follow our current work.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.2%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $54.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 88.5%; rating input score 89; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.5%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.48; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.2% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.