Alliance for Shared Values
Legal name: Alliance for Shared Values Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460647083
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Clifton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2126824278
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $989,586
- Expenses
- $959,954
- Assets
- $234,803
- Liabilities
- $348,544
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR MARK WEBB (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- YUKSEL ASLANDOGAN (EXECUTIVE DI): $105,190 total reported compensation
- OSMAN OZTOPRAK (MANAGING DIR): $84,363 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Alliance is composed of many diverse organizations dedicated to promoting community service, education, and interfaith understanding to elevate humanity and bring greater peace. First and the fastest one is via 24/7 live chat support that is available in multiple languages and is manned by knowledgeable agents who are quick to respond to your every inquiry. The more games you can play, and as such you are always going to have an enjoyable time playing slot machines and do have a fair and reasonable chance of winning when playing at licensed and regulated casinos. An incorrect guess forfeits the entire payout, pay out similarly across the table and frequently spend out in the.
What it reported doing in 2024
Helping organizations revisit their objectives, missions, and goals, and revise them if necessary. Provide media training to representatives and spokepersons. Help create talking points in issues pertaining to organizations. Help organizations put together seminars and conferences. Provide speakers for seminars. Coordinate third party engagements with the organizations to enhance their scope and reach. Plan and execute crises management in coordination with related organizations receiving services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.9%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 65.8%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $16.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.48; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 63.9% of revenue deployed · 65.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $632K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $105K · 9 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $189K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.