Alliance for Senior Health Care Financing Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815462797
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023278100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $5,144
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL FREEDMAN (DIRECTOR)
- SHAWN SMEALLIE (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Advocating on behalf of senior citizens with health care issues to the executive branch and members of congress in order to help americans secure their long term care. Ashcf educates key stakeholders in our nations capital about the life settlement industry, with the goal ofincreasing awareness of life settlements as an option for seniors looking for creative solutions to health care problems.
What it reported doing in 2021
Developing and advocating for a federal legislative proposal that would create senior health planning accounts (shpa). The proposal would permit seniors who sell their life insurance policies to roll over some or all of those proceeds tax-free into a shpa. The proposed legislation would allow seniors to make better use of existing assets they already own to pay for health care costs, including long-term care, and would provide additional funds to seniors and save taxpayer costs. To develop this proposal, ashcf consulted with policy makers and their staff, and third-party organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -85.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -100% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -84.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.