Alliance for Peacebuilding

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141870482
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2026307475
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Peace and Security

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,311,641
Expenses
$1,294,813
Assets
$1,781,952
Liabilities
$215,827

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ELIZABETH HUME (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • RACHEL M PIERCEY (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ELIZABETH HUME (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $186,581 total reported compensation
  • MEGAN CORRADO (DIRECTOR, POLICY & ADVOCACY): $127,987 total reported compensation
  • RACHEL M PIERCEY (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,977 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A world where all citizens and sectors, governments, multilateral organizations, and corporations are global champions for building sustainable peace and preventing violent conflict. We strive for a fundamental change in policies, development assistance, and collective action so that peacebuilding and conflict and atrocities prevention are the tools of first resort, resulting in a reduction in the number of fragile states and violent conflict globally by half by 2035.

What it reported doing in 2024

Policy and advocacy: afp's major accomplishments in 2024 for advocating for policies, laws and funding include: 1. Leading the global fragility act (gfa) coalition to ensure robust implementation of the law, resulting in the u.s. Government's first report to congress on gfa implementationrequired by lawspecifically mentioning the impact of the gfa coalition. 2. Leading afp's prevention and protection working group (ppwg) and securing a long overdue determination by the u.s. Government that members of the rapid support forces (rsf) and allied militias have committed genocide in sudan. 3. Securing mutual integration of the prevention-oriented canon of law across the gfa, elie wiesel genocide and atrocities prevention act, and the women, peace, and security act. Afp continued to achieve notable successes in advancing the integration of the u.s. Prevention-oriented canon of lawthe global fragility act (gfa), the elie wiesel genocide and atrocities prevention act (ewgapa), and the women, peace, and security (wps) act. Afp continued to colead the gfa coalition with mercy corps, a coalition of over 350 members that serves as the u.s. Government's go-to civil society partner. Throughout the year, afp convened a series of consultations to assess and provide recommendations on successful gfa operationalization. The first report to congress required under the law specifically mentioned the impact of the gfa coalition. 2024 marked the second year of afp's leadership of the prevention and protection working group (ppwg), a coalition dedicated to improving u.s. Government policies and civilian capacities to avert and respond to mass atrocities and protect civilians, which grew by over 100 members during the year. Afp brokered monthly consultations between ppwg and u.s. Government officials on a range of topics, such as sudan. Afp also convened a series of consultations before and after the release of the administration's annual report to congress on ewgapa implementation, as well as presented the group's written assessment of the report to the interagency atrocity prevention task force. Notably, the 2024 report included dozens of recommendations submitted by afp and ppwg in 2023. Afp was thrilled to see the inclusion of the "integration of atrocity prevention in u.s. Strategies" section in the 2024 report released in july, as it was one of the top recommendations identified in the assessment of the 2023 report drafted by afp. The 2024 report also includes specific subsections on atrocity prevention integration concerning the wps act and strategy and the gfa and strategy to prevent conflict and promote stability. Afp continued to update our calls to action on ukraine and the conflict in israel-palestine. In january 2025, after significant education from afp, the state department issued a long overdue determination that members of the rapid support forces (rsf) and allied militias have committed genocide in sudan. In 2024, afp elevated the wps agenda and advanced its integration within the u.s.'s prevention- oriented canon of law and other policies. Afp maintained its leadership position within the u.s. Civil society working group on wps and spearheaded consultations with and the development of community recommendations for USAID, the department of state, the department of defense, and the department of homeland security to ensure prevention is centered and that gfa and atrocity prevention principles are integrated into their agency-specific plans to operationalize the updated u.s. Wps strategy (october 2023). Verbatim language from our recommendations incorporated into each plan, released in january 2025. Additionally, afp's acting deputy director, megan corrado, received the una-nca's perdita houston human rights award for her outstanding work advocating for human rights and elevating wps in all policies, programs, and objectives. In 2024, afp leveraged its convening power and publications to advance the integration of peacebuilding and pre

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 71.1%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.3%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 71.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $920K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $187K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.