Alliance for Neighborhood Restoration Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300013408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cocoa, FL, USA
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$137,036
Expenses
$129,079
Assets
$27,519

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Delores McLaughlin (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Delores McLaughlin (Executive Director)
  • Sonja Moragne-Mitchell (Program Director)
  • Shaundala Black (Board Chair)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community Safety Career Readiness and Community building. Work with the local municipality and law enforcement to provide crime prevention services to families and youth including After-School activities sports mentoring youth leadership and career readiness. An average of 130 youth received services during this fiscal year.

What it reported doing in 2024

Youth Employment Training and Career Readiness provide youth with employability skills such as resumes applications interviewing dressing for success On the job training and career shadowing. 20 youth received stipends an average of 325-400.00 upon successful completion of the program which also has a volunteer component.of

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 18
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.5%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 19

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 61.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.5% of revenue deployed · 18.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.