Alliance for Metropolitan Stability

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411977419
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6123324471
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$949,507
Expenses
$1,037,952
Assets
$2,209,483
Liabilities
$109,121

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NELIMA SITATI-MUNENE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOO HEE POMPLUN (EXECUTIVE DI): $137,860 total reported compensation
  • MAURA BROWN (ASSOCIATE DI): $132,001 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations and advocacy groups with a mission to build power across the intersections of geography, race, culture, and issues in the twin cities region to eliminate systems of oppression and advance our collective liberation. We envision a vibrant region where growth and development decisions, policies, practices, and investments are centered in the needs and expertise of low-wealth people and black, indigenous, immigrant, and people of color; historical harms are addressed; and our healing, belonging, and prosperity are prioritized in decisions about our current and future communities. The alliance engages dozens of other allied organizations in advancing our shared vision for an equitable region through: --coalition organizing: we organize coalitions that cross the boundaries of race, culture, geography and issues to advance equity and justice. We use an inside/outside strategy, building strong and effective allies within systems as w

What it reported doing in 2024

Regional equtiy project: through the regional equity project, the alliance builds and convenes coalitions that advance equity in the twin cities region. Our regional equity work is comprised of multiple bodies of work, including the business resource collective and equitable development principles & scorecard. Additionally, it includes our internal culture-building work to internally live the values we espouse for our outward-facing work, and exploratory work for new initiatives - which in 2024 included an exploration into narrative. Business resource collective (brc): the business resource collective is a coalition of community development and wealth-building organizations that envisions a Minnesota where thriving bipoc-owned businesses build and sustain the culture, wealth, and economic vitality of our communities. In 2024, the brc worked with deed to assess and map the small business ecosystem to identify the strengths and gaps of the ecosystem and recommend strategies to best meet the needs of bipoc small businesses and entrepreneurs. Equitable development principles & scorecard: the alliance convenes an equitable development principles & scorecard practitioners table formed of people interested in using this tool to help residents, community-based organizations, and local government plan for development that will repair past harms and contribute to a stronger, more inclusive, and thriving community. This tool provides a framework to reclaim power and ensure that development is not isolated projects but rather becomes an integral piece of a collective commitment to create wealth, opportunity, and livability for historically and systemically marginalized communities. In 2024, we held two convenings - spring convening focused on minneapolis park & recreation board indigenous acknowledgement and reconciliation action plan efforts to integrate truth, reconciliation, and acknowledgement of indigenous land, people, and nations into our work, policies, procedures and spaces. Then a fall convening focused on thirdspace action lab's research into an anti-racist paradigm in community development and dominant narratives where racism shows up that perpetuate inequitable systems, structures, and practices in the field.. Narrative project: with alliance partner organization, alliance explored what a new narrative for the region may look like for equitable development that is visionary and that communities can collectively build towards. The exploration of narrative by this advisory is informing the work of alliance as it adapts to the everchanging political landscape in 2025. Internal culture building: alliance looks to be a regional equity leader and can only be successful if we live the values that we put into our work. Therefore, since covid's impact on organizational cultures - shifting expectations, shifting daily stressors, and how relationships get built, alliance has put significant investment and intentionality into adapting and building a new culture to the new times. Culture building has included staff retreats, use of consultants, and investing in the time we spend as a team. This effort has paid off with retention remaining steady through these efforts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 86% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 90
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $61.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 97.7%; rating input score 98; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.13; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $886K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.