Alliance for Healthy Youth
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341764309
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Akron, OH, USA
- Phone
- 3308641359
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $423,125
- Expenses
- $471,276
- Assets
- $224,888
- Liabilities
- $115,778
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- CHERYL L BIDDLE (FOUNDER/EXEC DIRECTOR/VP): $60,047 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of alliance for healthy youth is to empower, encourage, and educate youth to make and keep healthy lifestyle choices.
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of alliance for healthy youth is to empower, encourage and educate youth to make and keep healthy lifestyle choices. Our goal is to equip youth with the knowledge and skills to make decisions and practice behaviors that enhance health and wellness. Programs are school-based at the invitation of middle and high schools in summit and in seven other Ohio counties: program service accomplishments: middle school prevention education curriculum, rsvp, sets standards for risk avoidance of premarital sex and substance use. Healthy relationships, future dating standards including dating violence education, human trafficking awareness, benefits of avoiding alcohol and other drug use, and goal setting help to achieve a successful future. Students learn that parenting is an adult responsibility, how to set and keep physical limits, how alcohol and other drug use are interconnected with other risk behaviors, and healthy decision-making skills. Lesson plans help students correlate decision making with the risks of alcohol and other drug use, addiction, tobacco/nicotine/vaping use and premarital sexual activity. Rsvparent meetings and parent/guardian child homework help stimulate communication between students and their families. C.a.t.s. Youth led prevention program is designed for high schools and addresses avoidance of risk activities, healthy relationships, internet safety, mental health and wellness topics. High school students are trained by the youth development director who is ocps certified. Students develop original, creative fact-based presentations in order to provide skills to avoid substance use, how to choose healthy activities and relationships, avoid dating violence prevent human trafficking and to ask for help when needed. C.a.t.c.h. Program is dedicated to providing youth-led peer support and school-based help for high school students who are struggling and could be part of the eleven percent of area students who report having no friends.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $33.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 86.3%; rating input score 86; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.7%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $361K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.