Allen County Drug & Alcohol Consortium Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
432069293
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Phone
2604228412
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Reported finances

Revenue
$705,649
Expenses
$700,945
Assets
$350,775
Liabilities
$175,026

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRAD STILES (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MONIQUE JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DI): $96,886 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide an effective network to collaboratively prevent substance abuse, primarily by youth, and to reduce the negative impact of alcohol and other drugs in the allen county community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Drug-free Indiana (dfi) - as one of 92 county-based coordinating councils defined by statute in Indiana, the organization completes all state requirements including submitting an annual comprehensive community plan and is approved by the state to receive county-based funds in order to focus on intervention, prevention, and justice services in the allen county community. These funds are then distributed via intervention scholarships, justice mini grants, and prevention mini grants. Handle with care (hwc) - through a grant from idoh, the organization has initiated a grassroots effort to pilot a handle with care program. The hwc model requires that a nondescript notification is sent to a child's school when they have a documented interaction with law enforcement for any reason so that trauma-informed care can be provided if needed. This effort has required collaboration with local school districts, local law enforcement agencies, and local child protective agencies. Overdose fatality review (ofr) - the organization prepares case reviews and conducts monthly meetings which include representatives from local health departments, law enforcement agencies, healthcare providers, grief support professionals, child protective agencies, medical examiners/coroners, and substance use treatment professionals. The purpose of these meetings is to conduct a thorough review of preventable overdose deaths in allen county to better understand how and why an individual dies as a result of an overdose and to act to prevent other deaths. Funding for this grant ended in august 2023, but through collaborative efforts with the member agencies and allen county department of health, it will continue on a volunteer basis through at least 2024. Project alert - through a grant from dmha, the organization facilitates the implementation of an evidence-based curriculum that addresses risk factors for substance use of today's teens and effectively increases their likelihood to remain drug-free. Wellness initiative for senior education (wise) and community conversations-through a grant from dmha, the organization facilitates the implementation of an evidence-based program to promote physical and mental health in senior citizens, as well as one-off conversations focused on health, wellness, and nutrition issues and instruction for senior citizens. Stop suicide northeast Indiana (ssnei) - through a grant from idoh/title v, the organization facilitates the activities of the stop suicide northeast Indiana coalition. Ssnei conducts c-ssrs trainings, hosts an annual candlelight ceremony in memorial of loved ones lost to suicide, provides toolkits free of charge to local entities who suffer a loss within their communities, and offers other training and education as requested. Talk. They hear you (tthy) - through a grant from dmha, the organization implements the "talk. They hear you." media campaign which aims to reduce underage drinking and substance use among youths under the age of 21 by providing parents and caregivers with information and resources they need to address alcohol and other drug use with their children early. Too good for drugs - through a grant from dmha, the organization implements an evidence based, universal k-12 prevention education program designed to mitigate the risk factors and enhance protective factors related to atod use. The lessons introduce and develop social and emotional skills. Local coordinating council meetings are held collaboratively with prevention, intervention, and justice partners bimonthly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 43%; rating input score 43; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.5; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.6% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $646K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $97K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.