All4one Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205883948
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Plainfield, IN, USA
Phone
3172709495
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,741,544
Expenses
$1,327,953
Assets
$894,920
Liabilities
$23,418

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENT SUSUD (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • KENT SUSUD (President): $91,970 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

All4Ones mission is to strengthen families through outdoor adventures and sport programs by inspiring them to place God at the center of their relationships. By equipping families with faith-based tools and a biblical worldview, All4One helps them thrive, grow in unity, and build legacies of faith and service.

What it reported doing in 2024

All4Ones 4MUS ministry facilitates transformative outdoor adventures for adults and families, fostering spiritual awakening, relationship growth, and clarity of purpose. 4MUS programs include: the Xtreme Character Challenge for men, the Arise Challenge for women, the Fatherhood Challenge, the Father & Daughter and Father & Son Challenges, the Leadership Challenge for business leaders, and the Youth Leadership Initiative.SportQuest reaches youth globally through collaborative sports initiatives, helping them and their families encounter Jesus and embrace a biblical worldview. These programs collectively impacted families by strengthening their faith, inspiring service, and equipping them to thrive as ambassadors of Gods Kingdom. SportQuest also led cross-cultural Vision Trips for youth and families to expand their vision of God, themselves, and others as they serve internationally.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 68
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.9%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $109.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.67; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.9% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.