All Things Women Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824973764
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Livonia, MI, USA
Phone
3137336265
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Neighborhood Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$228,477
Expenses
$160,827
Assets
$234,021
Liabilities
$126,900

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE SMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN BENNETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARYUM DAVIS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHANIE SMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • NICOLE SCOTT (SECRETARY)
  • JOHN BENNETT (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To nbsp; provide nbsp; comprehensive nbsp; programs nbsp; and nbsp; services nbsp; to nbsp; women nbsp; and nbsp; families nbsp; who nbsp; may nbsp; or nbsp; may nbsp; not nbsp; be nbsp; experiencing nbsp; homeless nbsp; in nbsp; the nbsp; state nbsp; of nbsp; Michigan nbsp; to nbsp; provide nbsp; programs nbsp; and nbsp; services nbsp; designed nbsp; to nbsp; support nbsp; and nbsp; remove nbsp; barrier nbsp; to nbsp; homelessness

What it reported doing in 2023

Recovery housing

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 32
  • Transparency & Controls: 53
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.6%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 43.5%; rating input score 43
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.6%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 60.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.6% of revenue deployed · 43.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $80K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.