All Rise for Justice
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541791197
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035759400
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,247,885
- Expenses
- $21,597,556
- Assets
- $17,067,619
- Liabilities
- $1,198,819
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CARSON FOX (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CARSON FOX (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $468,845 total reported compensation
- JANET MCCULLER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $336,045 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER BROPHY (CHIEF OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS): $328,923 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All rise for justice (all rise) seeks to reduce substance abuse, crime, and recidivism by promoting and advocating for the establishment, growth, and funding of drug courts and providing for the collection and dissemination of information, technical assistance, and mutual support to association members.since 1994, all rise has worked tirelessly at the international, national, state, and local levels to create and enhance drug courts, including adult, juvenile, family, reentry, and tribal models; dwi courts; and veterans treatment courts. The award-winning all rise is the premier national repository, training, and advocacy organization for the drug court model, representing over 27,000 multi-disciplinary justice professionals and community leaders.
What it reported doing in 2025
Other programs: all rise's center for advancing justice (caj) is partnering with justice system agencies and community-based organizations in kenosha county, Wisconsin, to implement the every court is a treatment court initiative. This effort is designed to strengthen the county's capacity to universally screen, assess, and promptly connect individuals to appropriate, evidence-based interventions that address each individual's criminogenic risk factors and clinical needs, consistent with the evidence-based practices outlined in all rise's adult treatment court best practice standards. These interventions include treatment courts, diversion programs, pretrial supervision, and other supportive services. In 2025, all rise and kenosha county achieved several major milestones. The partnership established universal risk and needs screening for criminal defendants and developed individualized treatment and supervision plans informed by validated risk-need assessments. The district attorney and public defender formalized collaboration through a memorandum of understanding. Key stakeholders, including the judge, prosecutor, probation officers, public defender, jail staff, and treatment providers, convened to initiate data collection, define emergency clinical protocols, and build the infrastructure for continuous quality improvement. The team also completed an evaluation plan, updated the system map to incorporate new screening and assessment processes, and identified strategic priorities for the coming year. Caj staff are also developing technical assistance tools informed by lessons learned through this collaboration. These resources will serve as a model for jurisdictions nationwide seeking to implement universal risk and needs screening and assessment practices.bja comprehensive opioid, stimulant, and other substance use program (cossup) (navajo county cope program-nctaa): all rise's center for advancing justice (caj) received a subaward from navajo county, Arizona, to help plan and implement the county overdose prevention and engagement (cope) program. The program seeks to prevent overdose deaths among court-involved individuals by rapidly screening for overdose risk and immediately referring at-risk persons to treatment and supervision. All rise staff are providing intensive training and technical assistance to navajo county justice system agencies and community-based organizations to support successful project implementation. Through a combination of on-site and remote assistance, all rise has led a system-wide needs assessment and resource mapping process and helped develop a detailed project blueprint and implementation plan, including written policies and procedures, a case flow chart, an overdose risk screening tool, a participant contract, informational materials, and more. The cope program began accepting clients in late 2023 and is currently in operation. All rise is continuing to support ongoing design improvements, data collection, and project evaluation. Juvenile and family court judiciary education on substance abuse use and substance use disordersthe state judiciary education on substance use and substance use disorder (sje) project, funded by the office of national drug control policy (ondcp), was designed to strengthen judicial understanding of substance use disorder (sud) and evidence-based responses across the continuum of justice. The project emphasized education that supports sound judicial discretion, public-health-oriented approaches, and the integration of treatment, effective supervision, and recovery principles into everyday judicial practice. All rise continued implementation of statewide, national, and tribal judicial education activities while preparing a comprehensive evaluation summary to support project close-out. Over the full project period, the sje initiative reached judges serving in criminal, family, juvenile, dependency, and general jurisdiction courts through in-person institutes, conference s
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 65% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 88.4%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.6% of revenue deployed · 88.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 11 filed program accomplishments · $19.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $469K · 31 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.