All Nations Worship Assembly Atlanta

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
812807661
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
6784362455
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$638,626
Expenses
$498,571
Assets
$140,055
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Labryant Friend (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Labryant Friend (President): $84,483 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Engage Culture: One of the most powerful aspects of Jesus ministry was His desire to engage culture. He literally changed the world by using what others would have called the least of these to make it happen. He had no regard for title or reputation of the status quo; instead, He sought to meet people right where they were and cause their hearts to be changed for the Kingdom. He did it for Zacchaeus (Luke 19:1-10). He did it for the woman at the well (John 4). We believe that He desires to do it for the entire world today. By engaging culture, we understand that we live in a society that has little regard for God. Instead of using that as a barrier, we use it as the tool to allow the light of Christ to shine through us and go into every mans world. Regardless of the current status of ones life or situation, we will never allow a moment in their lives to stop what God wants to reveal in their destiny. Since Jesus engaged culture and met people right where they were, so will we. Equippin

What it reported doing in 2017

All Nations ATLANTA has the responsibility of raising up leaders and voices that fit the need for the region God has called us to serve locally and for the world abroad. Within the context of Atlanta, we know that we have a God-sized vision to see a city shaken and turned upside down for the glory of God. Connect with one of our growing ministries to see how you can be apart of the vision

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.1%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.9%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 158% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 188.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $499K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $84K · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.