All-in Milwaukee Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832541054
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Phone
- 4144053013
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,891,370
- Expenses
- $3,569,630
- Assets
- $19,013,907
- Liabilities
- $454,805
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLISON WAGNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & BOARD SECRETARY)
Highest reported compensation
- ALLISON WAGNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & BOARD SECRETARY): $215,821 total reported compensation
- NATHANIEL BRENN (SENIOR DIRECTOR OF FINANCE & OPERATIONS): $164,223 total reported compensation
- CHRISTA KEEL (DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR): $133,636 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All-in milwaukee is a college completion program that provides financial aid, advising, program and career support to high potential, limited-income, diverse milwaukee students to complete college, build meaningful careers and transform the milwaukee community.
What it reported doing in 2024
All-in milwaukee is a college completion and career placement program that combines financial aid, affordable university costs coupled with intensive advising and career development support to ensure diverse students complete college and matriculate into the milwaukee workforce. Launching in 2018, we have over 600 scholars across eight university partners in our program. They are 100% limited-income, 98% students of color primarily from milwaukee. We hope to continue scaling the number of scholars each year to grow the diverse workforce of milwaukee. Our promise is to complete college, build careers, transform milwaukee!
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.8%; rating input score 32
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 63.9%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.33; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.8% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $216K · 19 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.