All in Energy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824949924
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Roslindale, MA, USA
- Phone
- 8573095080
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,480,446
- Expenses
- $2,317,814
- Assets
- $1,512,329
- Liabilities
- $263,026
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gabriel Shapiro (Co-Founder & Co-Executive Director)
- Rouwenna Altemose (Co-Founder & Co-Executive Director)
- Safiyyah Khan (Board co-President)
- Megan Aki (Board Co-President)
Highest reported compensation
- Gabriel Shapiro (Co-Founder & Co-Executive Director): $104,401 total reported compensation
- Rouwenna Altemose (Co-Founder & Co-Executive Director): $94,518 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All In Energy is a nonprofit organization that enables underserved residents (historically renters, low-to-moderate income households, people who speak languages other than English, and people of color) to save money on their utility bills by connecting them to government and utility energy efficiency and renewable energy programs. We also serve as a talent pipeline, expanding clean energy job opportunities for individuals in the communities we serve through a paid, hands-on training experience.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, All In Energy continued to lead the Mass Save Community First Partnership, operating in over 50 municipalities across Massachusetts, including Boston, Lawrence, Chelsea, Framingham, and other Environmental Justice (EJ) communities. Through these partnerships with municipalities and community-based organizations, All In Energy helped thousands of residents access no-cost home energy assessments, insulation, and heating and cooling upgrades, collectively saving families millions of dollars on energy bills while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. All In Energy opened a new office in Lawrence, creating a local hub for our bilingual Customer Action Team and expanding in-person support for residents in the Merrimack Valley. The hybrid team of English, Spanish, and Portuguese-speaking staff provided one-on-one assistance to help residents schedule energy assessments, navigate utility programs, and access additional energy assistance resources. All In Energy launched its pilot Energy Workforce Training Program with support from the MassCEC Equity Workforce Grant, preparing bilingual customer service representatives for careers as energy auditors. This initiative aims to build pathways for underrepresented workers into technical clean energy roles, addressing industry-wide diversity and inclusion gaps. Throughout 2024, All In Energy continued offering our Energy Bill Check Up service, which helps residents identify predatory third-party suppliers, switch to the residential assistance rate, and access payment plans or debt forgiveness programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.57 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 35.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $104K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.