All In Action Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934403347
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2154296632
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $644,217
- Expenses
- $764,487
- Assets
- $146,792
- Liabilities
- $267,062
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nourbese Flint (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Nourbese Flint (President): $65,057 total reported compensation
- Blair Schuman (Treasurer): $7,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All In Action Fund is a catalyst for abortion justice committed to building the political and economic power of people of color working to make ends meet.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024 we hosted two debate watch parties in Philadelphia for the Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates in partnership with PA Working Families Party and Watch Party PHL complete with debate night bingo turning out over 100 people. Also in Philadelphia we hosted a voter registration day party that brought the community together to check and update their voter registration status plus tarot readings delicious food and great music. In Atlanta we hosted Witches and Pumpkins for Abortion Justice- a Halloween themed voter engagement brunch where we helped people make a plan to vote check their polling location and look up their sample ballot - all while carving pumpkins getting a tarot reading and enjoying a spooky dance performance! In New York we hosted Politics Film and Abortion - a film screening of Red White and Blue as well as All* In Action Funds newest short film in collaboration with Klick The Trial followed by a panel discussion on the political implications of abortion access Prop 1 ballot measure in New York and how folks can get involved.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 71% for direct work, and 29% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 43.5%; rating input score 43; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.82; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.9% of revenue deployed · 71.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $547K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 2 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $144K reported
- Consistency: 41 of 42 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 43/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.