All Hands Raised

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931149789
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5032345404
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$934,680
Expenses
$1,019,796
Assets
$1,231,615
Liabilities
$194,911

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MORGAN DAY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEFFENI MENDOZA GRAY (VP OF OPERATIONS THROUGH 06/25): $134,068 total reported compensation
  • MORGAN DAY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $98,753 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We champion racial equity in the educational system and mobilize our community to advance sustainable systems change so every child achieves their full potential, from cradle to career.

What it reported doing in 2024

All hands raised (ahr) serves as the collective impact "backbone organization for the all hands raised partnership. The collective impact focus is on improving education outcomes for multnomah county's 206,000 children, youth, and young adults. With a focus on educational equity, ahr collaborates with partners and community stakeholders. As conveners and facilitators, we provide support to these partners who collectively identify all of the barriers to bipoc student success in order to agree on strategies to remove them collectively. And we are the only organization with a data-driven and evidence-based approach that is empowered by the community to gather and evaluate data to document and report on how students are doing cradle to career. (continued on sch o) the ahr partnership is committed to fundamental system transformation, understanding that this approach can bring long-term substantive systemic changes and improve academic outcomes for bipoc students. To implement this shared approach of systemic transformation, ahr's goal is to assess and deliver collective impact tools that are critical to creating change and aligning community assets. We maintain a strong leadership structure that brings key leaders from a broad range of community sectors (business, non-profit, education, government, and elected officials) to collectively support the work to find systemic changes and practices that will lead to bipoc student success improvement.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.6%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 46.7%; rating input score 47
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.1%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.6% of revenue deployed · 46.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $476K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $134K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.