All Greater Good Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870813455
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Beverly Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3102712236
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specifically Named Diseases Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,539
- Expenses
- $151,580
- Assets
- $614,667
- Liabilities
- $126,519
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR KATJA VAN HERLE (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR KATJA VAN HERLE (PRESIDENT & CEO): $96,000 total reported compensation
- LAWANDA DWELLINGHAM (SECRETARY): $13,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to provide outreach and education centered on "the art of wellness", connecting the worlds of art and health by highlighting the complex but essential relationship they have. Art plays a role in a healthy life, and a healthy life helps one create to the fullest potential. Our goal is to develop and execute programs that unite the two, and spread the idea of their interdependence. We strive to build productive relationships and make a positive impact with all of our pursuits.
What it reported doing in 2024
All greater good foundation is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization focused on "the art of wellness". We pursue programs that unite the understanding of health and art, and explore the complex relationship they share. We have a long history in connecting the public to scientific findings, translating the complex understanding of health to a common and understandable language. We are moving forward with that translation effort focusing now on the art of wellness, and everything that includes.we believe in teamwork, and we work extensively with partners to pursue programs that would be impossible alone. We believe this broadens the impact we are able to have on the world around us, and allows us to spread our mission further.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 14
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.1%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.06; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -30.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -30.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.1% of revenue deployed · 74.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.