All Good Studio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
852866195
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Rockwall, TX, USA
Phone
9729789197
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Media, Communications Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,629
Expenses
$69,608
Assets
$11,424
Liabilities
$21,656

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • James Keith Green II (Founder & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Heather Lynn Kimball (Community Developer)
  • James Keith Green II (Founder & CEO)
  • Holly Nicole Green (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

All Good Studio's mission is to provide free communications services, consulting, and support for the good of those doing good - that is, for the nonprofits that need these services, mostly due to a lack of finances or staff expertise.

What it reported doing in 2025

Communications & Marketing Services: Once small nonprofits in need of our services apply for help, are selected, and undergo our consulting process, they typically need our help executing the plan of action as well, and in the majority of cases, this involves our team communicating their mission to the general public through efforts such as writing social media posts, providing catalog content, creating videos for campaigns, creating copy for websites, developing donor touchpoint processes, creating branding guides, and so on. In 2025, this "program" helped 9 nonprofits in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.9; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.