All Day Every Day
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262549666
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Syracuse, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3154369935
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $232,653
- Expenses
- $163,376
- Assets
- $326,796
- Liabilities
- $455
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeffrey Knighton (President, Treasurer)
- Davis Yohe (Vice President, Secretary)
People named in this filing
- Jeffrey Knighton (President, Treasurer)
- Don Doerr (Board member)
- Louis Muraco (Board member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All Day Every Days mission is to redefine the realities of inner city youth from desperation to hope. This is accomplished through community outreach and SCSD based partnerships. Our community outreach gives participants experiences and opportunities they would not have otherwise have. These events allow our vplunteers the opportunity to build strong relationships with the youth and be a positive influence in their lives. Our school based partnerships allow us to have a presence in the schools daily to provide student/staff support and the opportunity to help positively change the school culture. This includes academic and behavioral support, restorative practices, event planning, and goal/incentive based mentoring. The relationships built in the community are reinforced and make a larger impact as participants are mentored in the schools.
What it reported doing in 2025
All Day Every Days community outreach gives participants experiences and opportunities they would not have otherwise have. These events allow our volunteers the opportunity to build strong relationships with the youth and be a positive influence in their lives. Our school based partnerships allow us to have a presence in the schools daily to provide student/staff support and the opportunity to help positively change the school culture. This includes academic and behavioral support, restorative practices, event planning, and goal/incentive based mentoring. The relationships built in the community are reinforced and make a larger impact as participants are mentored in the schools.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.5%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.5% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.