All Among Us Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813713934
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3145604895
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$-144,694
Expenses
$228,039
Assets
$232,263
Liabilities
$4,823

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cathryn Shaw (Ex-Officio, Executive Director)
  • Tom Nations (President)
  • Cheryl Hansen (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Cathryn Shaw (Ex-Officio, Executive Director): $74,633 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of All Among Us is to offer secure transformative housing and supportive wraparound services to women who are struggling to achieve and maintain stable housing independence.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our Life Mentoring Program builds relationships with critically at-risk populations who have experienced multiple life-traumas. Most will suffer from addiction and mental illness due to their traumas. All Among Us exists to help people suffering from trauma, abuse, mental health diagnosis, addiction, and systemic suffering. As anyone familiar with these would know, these problems aren't done with us as soon as we would like to be done with them. Recovery is a lifelong process, and with a strong community in your corner, it is also a joyful one! The Life Mentoring Program is committed to teaching financial literacy in a way someone with no previous financial education can hear and learn. We have had great success with this one-on-one program in providing a path out of debt, into saving, and becoming a commitment to self-sufficiency. The program also focuses on life skills, mental and health wellness, job readiness, 12-step recovery, in-patient recovery, and providing love, care and dignity to everyone in the program. The Life Mentoring Program replaced the AfterCare program, and in 2025 this program served 350 individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $168.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -257.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.7%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $207K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.