All About Women Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 020654930
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6156697419
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,098
- Expenses
- $11,879
- Assets
- $17,788
- Liabilities
- $365
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TERI POWELL (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JULIA BAKER (PRESIDENT)
- JALESSA JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERI POWELL (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JULIA BAKER (PRESIDENT)
- JALESSA JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
All about women (aaw) connects women with engaging, free resources to balance and renew their lives and improve their health. Aaw provides programs that are inclusive, interactive, accessible and fun through our website and in person events.
What it reported doing in 2018
All about women hosted 3 free lunch and learn programs in an underserved community to reach the women who do not have the transportation or means to take advantage of the free resources in nashville and the surrounding areas. The topics and panel discussions focused on healthy eating, healthy relationships, and money management. At each luncheon, a panel of experts gave helpful daily life tips as well as professional resources. We offered enrichment activities for the attendee's children and lunch for all attendees. Over 120 women and children attended the lunch events in 2018
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 37.9%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.3%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 37.9% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.