Alive Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454568606
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Skaneateles, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9178377431
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-1,688
- Expenses
- $3,569
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIA WAMP (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL WAMP (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JULIA WAMP (PRESIDENT)
- MICHAEL WAMP (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- JOHN KUHN (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporation is organized to assist persons of all ages who have ever been advised by a physician that they have cancer. The corporation will focus on lessening the distress, pain, emotional and physical difficulties generally experienced by those diagnosed with cancer by offering non-medical, non-health-related, general wellness services for cancer patients and survivors. The corporation will provide a location for cancer patients and survivors to gather to socialize, obtain fitness services, learn about healthy nutrition, and generally enhance their spiritual, mental, and physical wellness through communication and instruction.
What it reported doing in 2017
Georgia stormes provided cancer survivors and patients complementary yoga.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 9
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -311.4%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -39.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -82.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.