Alive Again Life Recovery Mission

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800580655
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Bozeman, MT, USA
Phone
4065855497
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$119,005
Expenses
$145,429
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE DEBOER (President)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN MCCULLOCH (Director)
  • GERRY GROGGEL (Director)
  • PAUL LARSON (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Alive again life revocery was established to fulfill three primary objectives. First, the organization organizes, obtains volunteers and provides programs for a life recovery ministry offered at evangelical free chruch, bozeman, Montana. The program, conducted every friday night, is open to the public. After a free meal and worship music, trained leaders and group facilitators work with individuals through a twelve step program for healing and recovery from poor choices, addictions, divorce, and other life struggles. Second, the excutive director mentors and disciples individuals who have participated in the life recovery ministry.finally, twelve of the fiftenn hours per week of individual mentoring and discipleship is provided at the prerelease center in bozeman, mt

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.6%; rating input score 11
  • Program expense ratio: 8.6%; rating input score 9

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -22.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 75.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -24.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.6% of revenue deployed · 8.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 11/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.