Alianza Nacional Constitucionalista

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263399558
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3053431923
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Human Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$700
Expenses
$1,096
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HORACIO GARCIA SR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HORACIO GARCIA SR (PRESIDENT)
  • LUIS ZUNIGA (VICE-PRES)
  • RAUL F PINO (SEC/TRES)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to assist the cuban people toward the attainment of a democratic government through education in the virtues and advantages of a democratic government; the development of a democratic system with free elections and assistance in the reconstruction of cuba following the end of communism.

What it reported doing in 2015

The organization's purpose is to promote a free and domocratic government in cuba through education of democratic principles, observance of human rights and freedom. This objective is met by supporting the activities of other 501c(3) organization; primarily "plantados hasta la libertad", which in turn supports the freedom of cuban political prisoners and dissidents.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -56.6%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -42.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -44.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.