Alfa International Global Legal Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133084204
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
3126422532
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Mutual/Membership Benefit N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,107,745
Expenses
$3,763,106
Assets
$4,781,962
Liabilities
$1,189,158

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JESSICA ZAROSKI BAUER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JESSICA ZAROSKI BAUER (CEO): $322,388 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT REILAND (CFO): $239,824 total reported compensation
  • KATHERINE MCCORMACK (CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER): $198,637 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Legal association providing educational and marketing services to member firms.

What it reported doing in 2025

Member servicesobjective: to strengthen alfa international's global network of independent law firms by helping members build relationships, refer work, develop business and access leadership opportunities to maximize their membership value.alfa international provides:- member onboarding and outreach- ceo visits- business development support- practice group, ancillary group and committee coordination, including event planning- referral tracking- work survey administration- information sharing via website password-protected portal- sharing news and publications on alfai social media platforms and alfai website- conducting client feedback calls- accounting services related to event logisticsexamples include:- supporting approximately 140-member firms including 12 active practice groups and 4 international regional groups, and the managing partner and marketing managers' interest forums- coordinating monthly and quarterly calls for practice groups and several committee meetings- coordinating logistics and agendas for in-person practice group and committee meetings- conducting strategy sessions for active practice groups- updating member firm and attorney profile pages on the alfai website- maintaining member resources through the password-protected website portal- distributing referral and work survey results- conducting client feedback calls- building brand awareness through posting of member news and publications via social mediain 2025, alfai reported that 78% of member firms submitted referral reports to headquarters, 88% of member firms were identified as receiving at least one inbound referral, and eight client feedback calls had been conducted. Alfai also supported membership development by welcoming new member firms in markets such as boise, el salvador, croatia and saudi arabia and by identifying priority membership searches in the united states and internationally.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 72
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.27; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $322K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.