Alexandria Stylebook Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874399027
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Small Business Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,752
- Expenses
- $86,698
- Assets
- $59,869
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
People named in this filing
- BRITTANY PATTERSON HILL (OFFICER)
- ADRIEN COTTON (OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Alexandria stylebook inc is a membership organization that operates a trade publication digital magazine in order to promote the members mostly women-owned small businesses and their business community located in alexandria Virginia. The board and directors donate their time and no members are paid for their participation in operating the organization. The members are billed and pay their dues quarterly in order to cover the expenses involved with producing the publication such as editing photography and other operating expenses. The intent is to only cover expenses and not to achieve a profit with the member dues. The goal of the organization is to expose the small business members to the community at large and increase customer traffic and awareness in order to achieve and maintain successful small businesses. The magazine can be viewed via the internet at alexandriastylebook.com.
What it reported doing in 2025
Operation of a trade publication digital magazine in order to promote the members mostly women-owned small businesses and their business community located in alexandria Virginia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.