Alexandria Sportsmans Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237014707
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Phone
7033466525
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$381,522
Expenses
$83,297
Assets
$451,970
Liabilities
$2,500

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ryan Fannon (President)
  • Kerry Adams (First Vice President)
  • Kelly Gambrell (Second Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ryan Fannon (President)
  • Kerry Adams (First Vice President)
  • Jeanne Jacob (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To recognize, reward and provide financial scholarships to City of Alexandria High School student-athletes for excellence in the classroom, on the field and to celebrate local sports history and fellowship.

What it reported doing in 2024

Form 990EZ, Program service accomplishments: The Alexandria Sportsman's Club meets in Alexandria, VA on the third Wednesday of every month. The purpose of these meetings is to celebrate local High School Sports fellowship and history, and to recognize outstanding male & female student-athletes of the month. These athletes of the month are chosen based on athletic & academic accomplishments over the period of one month. Each of the four area High Schools submit nominations to the Sportsman's Club for selection. Fifteen to Twenty student-athletes are selected during the year as Athletes of the Month. The awardees receive public recognition and a Plaque. Annually, in May, the Club hosts a large Banquet to recognize and reward student-athletes form all these Highs Schools as Athlete of the Year by the same process as the Athletes of the Month. Over Thirty (30) student-athletes are publicly recognized and rewarded with a Plaque at the Banquet. The Plaques are paid for through Contributions from members and ticket sales to the banquet. Additionally, Financial College Scholarships are awarded to selected student-athletes; these expenses are paid through contributions. An Independent Club Committee selects the Scholarship winners based on individual applications and comply to strict and publicly announced criteria for the Scholarships Awards. All Awards and Scholarships are made without regard to race, gender, sex, religion or political affiliation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 13.1%; rating input score 13
  • Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 78.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.43; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 52.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 13.1% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.