Alegria Montessori School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261731623
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
St. Petersburg, FL, US
Phone
727-866-1901
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,215,623
Expenses
$1,268,782
Assets
$1,262,327
Liabilities
$317,496

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • NICOLA ARANGO (DIRECTOR)
  • SARAH MADLE (DIRECTOR)
  • STEPHANIE MUSSETT (OFFICER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Alegria montessouri school is a non non profit school is to provide a nurturing, inclusive, and high-quality educational environment where every child is empowered to reach their full potential academically, socially, and emotionally. Through innovative teaching methods, individualized attention, and collaboration with families and the community, we strive to cultivate lifelong learners who are equipped with the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to become responsible citizens and leaders in an ever-changing world. Our commitment to diversity, equity, and excellence ensures that each student receives a personalized education that celebrates their unique strengths and addresses their individual needs. Together, we inspire curiosity, foster creativity, and instill a love for learning that transcends the classroom, preparing our students to thrive in the global society of tomorrow

What it reported doing in 2024

Academic excellence: to provide a rigorous and comprehensive curriculum that meets or exceeds state standards, ensuring all students develop essential academic skills and knowledge across various subject areas. Individualized learning: to implement personalized learning plans for each student, recognizing their unique strengths, interests, and learning styles, and providing appropriate interventions and support as needed to maximize their academic growth and success. Social and emotional development: to foster a positive and inclusive school culture where students feel safe, supported, and valued, promoting social- emotional learning initiatives that cultivate empathy, resilience, and healthy interpersonal relationships. Enrichment opportunities: to offer a diverse range of extracurricular activities, enrichment programs, and experiential learning opportunities that expand students' horizons, stimulate their curiosity, and foster their creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Community engagement: to actively engage families, caregivers, volunteers, and community partners in the educational process, promoting collaboration, communication, and mutual respect to create a strong network of support for our students and school community. Equity and access: to promote equity and access for all students, regardless of background or ability, by removing barriers to learning, providing equitable resources and opportunities, and addressing systemic inequalities to ensure every child has the chance to succeed. Continuous improvement: to engage in ongoing assessment, evaluation, and reflection to continuously improve our programs and practices, using data- driven decision-making and feedback from stakeholders to enhance the quality and effectiveness of our educational offerings. Global citizenship: to nurture students' understanding of and appreciation for diverse cultures, perspectives, and global issues, preparing them to be responsible, compassionate, and culturally competent global citizens who contribute positively to society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 63
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.