Albuquerque Interfaith Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850414704
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5053153596
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Interfaith

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,220
Expenses
$132,867
Assets
$62,633
Liabilities
$80,539

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANAMARGARITA OTERO (BOARD CHAIR)
  • MARY GRAVES (VICE CHAIR)
  • GLORYA HALE (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Albuquerque interfaith is an organization of congregations, schools, unions, and nonprofit organizations working together to create a better community. It is a broad-based, nonpartisan organization working to unite, train, and organize communities of albuquerque across all religious, racial, ethnic, economic, and neighborhood lines to work collectively for the public good.

What it reported doing in 2022

The organization's primary goal is to train and develop leaders in our institutions with the capacity to build a more just society.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.29; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $133K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.