Albert Schweitzer Fellowship of the San Francisco Bay Area
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 383912273
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- El Dorado Hills, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5103840267
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,825
- Expenses
- $148,471
- Assets
- $209,869
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- HOLLY BARBACCIA (PROGRAM DIRECTOR)
- JOHN SWARTZBERG (CHAIR)
- MERYL SEILIG (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific charitable purpose of this corporation is to address health disparities by developing leaders in service: individuals who are dedicated to and skilled in meeting the health needs of underserved communities and whose example influences and inspires others within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, or corresponding section of any future federal tax code.
What it reported doing in 2025
To improve the health of vulnerable people and minority populations now and in the future by developing a corps of leaders in service schweitzer fellowship professionals skilled in creating positive change within the health and service system of the local communities through community-based, mentored direct service; sustantainable development program and implementation; and a multidisciplinary, reflective leadership development program in order to build a community capacity and a professionally trained workforce.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 88% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 45
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.5%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 43.7%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 45.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.5% of revenue deployed · 43.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.