Albemarle Resource Conservation and Development Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581742784
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Edenton, NC, USA
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,669
Expenses
$123,272
Assets
$191,475
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • FENTON EURE (CHAIRMAN 2024 2025)
  • ERIN FLECKENSTEING (VICE-CHAIRMAN 2024)
  • SHANNON RAY (SECRETARY TREASURER 2024)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Albemarle RCD assists local governments and community groups in northeast NC with projects that protect land and water resources while promoting economic development.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bridge Street Drainage Study Town of Columbia NC | Albemarle RC&D partnered with the Town of Columbia NC to complete a drainage study for the Bridge Street area which experiences frequent street and yard flooding during heavy rain. The study documented existing ditches culverts and outfalls mapped low lying areas and identified problem locations where undersized or blocked infrastructure contributes to standing water. Recommended solutions include improved ditch grading debris and vegetation management and targeted culvert upgrades to restore flow paths. The project gives town officials a prioritized plan to reduce localized flooding protect homes and businesses and support future grant applications for construction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 43% for direct work, and 57% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 87.3%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 87.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.