Albany Rifle and Pistol Club Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930702088
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Shedd, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5414913755
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $943,639
- Expenses
- $836,238
- Assets
- $3,076,822
- Liabilities
- $22,698
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN BOESCH (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- FORREST SCHOENING (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- TRAVIS MASON (PRESIDENT)
- MARK KRONQUIST (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN BOESCH (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $80,552 total reported compensation
- SARAH ROGERS (PROGRAM MANAGER): $58,560 total reported compensation
- CECIL WESNER (PROGRAM MANAGER): $48,239 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a firearms and training facility. Our programs contribute to the practice of safe firearm handling and developing safe shooting skills. We encourage discipline and self-confidence in individual performance.
What it reported doing in 2025
Gun and sportsman shows - we sponsor twice a year shows with approximately 400 tables of antique, modern, and reproduction firearms, military collectibles, ammunition, reloading equipment, and supplies, knives, and optics. These shows are open to the public for a small entrance fee and allow them to become familiarized with gun laws, safe handling and storage procedures and provide a vast array of gun-related knowledge that isnt found in the general area. These gun shows allow attendants the chance to purchase firearms and related equipment and are held in strict compliance with state and federal laws. In addition, there is a special event held once a year in cooperation with glock: gssf. It is open to the public and it averages 250 competitors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 68
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.7%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 7
- Fundraising efficiency: $220.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.4%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.68; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.7% of revenue deployed · 7.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $60K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.