Albanian-american Enterprise Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133826249
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
3474468138
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Economic Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,638,985
Expenses
$141,369
Assets
$82,761,194
Liabilities
$609,565

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALEKSANDER SARAPULI (CO-CEO)
  • MARTIN MATA (CO-CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALEKSANDER SARAPULI (CO-CEO): $169,160 total reported compensation
  • MARTIN MATA (CO-CEO): $169,160 total reported compensation
  • FLORIDA QELLO (SECRETARY): $141,490 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The albanian-american enterprise fund (aaef or the fund) is a private investment fund established to assist albania in its transition to a market economy. To accomplish this, the aaef will invest in a wide array of private enterprises, disseminate western business know-how, and when appropriate, propose changes to government policies affecting business. Moreover, it is the funds intent to demonstrate to other potential investors that investment in albania can be successful and profitable. The fund strives to be a catalyst for additional private investment in albania.aaef is a nonstock nonprofit corporation established pursuant to the support for east european democracy act of 1989 for the primary purpose of promoting the private sector development in albania and policies and practices conductive to such development. The fund is capitalized by a grant agreement with the us agency for international development (USAID).

What it reported doing in 2021

Development of private sector of country of albania; through loans-grants-equity investments-feasibility studies- technical assistance-training-insurance-and other

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 74% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 45
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.6%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 97.9%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 585.43; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 43.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $141K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $169K · 5 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.